Workpaper Evidence
Tax Planning Software for CPAs: How to Evaluate It
Key takeaways
- Six criteria cover the decision: return intake, tax-software import, output, integrations, evidence trail and pricing model.
- Import depends on your prep software: a direct import only helps if the vendor supports the package your firm files with, so check its list before the demo.
- Output is what the client keeps: ask to see a finished plan, not the modeling screen, and check whether it carries your firm's brand.
- The evidence trail gets skipped in demos: every figure in the plan should point to a source document or published limit with an as-of date, plus who reviewed it and when.
- Pricing models differ: monthly tiers, per-seat and package pricing all show up, and published prices change, so confirm on the vendor page.
- TracePrep ships the Reasonable Compensation Study today: a tax-planning workflow is in development.
Every planning demo ends on a clean projection. The client's income, a few alternatives, a tidy savings figure. What the demo doesn't show is what happens on a Tuesday in April, when a preparer loads a messy return, the Reviewer asks where a number came from, and the plan has to land in the client file.
That gap is where tax planning software for CPAs actually gets chosen. The differences that matter to a firm with a recurring S-corp book sit in six places: how returns come in, whether data imports from your tax software, what the client receives, where the files go afterward, whether each figure traces to a source, and how the vendor charges.
This guide gives you a criteria table to copy into your own evaluation, then short, dated notes on six planning tools. It's written for owners, tax partners and Reviewers at growing firms with a recurring S-corp book.
Six criteria for evaluating tax planning software
Use one copy of this table per vendor. You'll fill the last two columns during the demo, while the vendor's screen is still in front of you.
Criterion | Question to ask in the demo | What a good answer looks like | Red flag to probe |
|---|---|---|---|
Return intake | How do prior-year returns get in, and how many at once? | Upload or import that handles your real volume, with extraction errors shown to the preparer | "It just reads everything" with no way to see what it missed |
Tax-software import | Does it import directly from the package we file with? | Your package is on the vendor's own supported list | Support claimed only on review sites |
Output | What does the client receive? | A plan the client can act on, in your firm's name | Only a savings number or a screen share |
Integrations | Where do the plan and source files end up? | Your cloud storage, CRM or practice tool, named on the vendor's own page | Integrations that need a custom build |
Evidence trail | Can you show the source for this figure, and who reviewed it? | Each figure tied to a document or published limit, with a date and a Reviewer sign-off | Figures with no source you can open |
Pricing model | What do we pay, and what do we keep if we stop? | Published pricing and a clear answer on retaining past plans | Pricing only on a call, or plans that disappear with the subscription |
Return intake
Intake decides how much preparer time each plan costs before any modeling starts. Some tools take a PDF upload, some take many returns at once, and some pull straight from the tax software. Ask what happens with a scanned return, a partial return or a return with state schedules, and how an extraction error shows up for the preparer to fix.
Tax-software import
A direct import removes rekeying, but only for the packages the vendor supports. List the tax software your firm files with first. Then check that package against the vendor's own supported list. Comparison articles go out of date.
Output
The output is what your client keeps and what your firm is judged on. Check whether it's a PDF plan, a slide deck or a memo, and whether it carries your firm's name. A strong plan reads like a planning memo where each recommendation traces to a source figure and a Reviewer sign-off.
Integrations
Once it's signed, the plan and its source files need a home. Ask where they go: your cloud storage, your CRM, your practice management tool. Take the answer from the vendor's own integrations page.
Evidence trail
This is the row most demos skip. For every figure in the plan, can your firm open the source document or published limit, see its as-of date, and see who reviewed it and when?
One might argue the projection is the product and the source file is overhead. In practice, the file is what the Reviewer signs and what your firm reopens when a client asks why a number changed. Here's a quick test. Say a plan recommends that an S-corp owner max out 401(k) deferrals. The plan should show the 2026 elective deferral limit of $24,500 and cite where it comes from (IRS, Notice 2025-67, as of 2026-09-23). If the software can't hold that citation next to the figure, your staff will keep it somewhere else, or nowhere.
It's the same discipline a firm applies to a Reasonable Compensation Study, covered in how to document reasonable compensation in workpapers.
Pricing model
Planning tools price by monthly tier, by seat, by client, or as part of a larger software package. Two questions matter more than the sticker: what's included at your volume, and what your firm keeps if it stops paying. A plan you delivered two years ago shouldn't leave your file when the subscription ends.
How six tax planning tools line up on the criteria
The notes below come from each vendor's own pages, accessed 2026-09-23, and give you a starting point for your own tax planning software comparison. They cover what each vendor says it does. They don't test how well it works in practice. Features and prices change, so confirm on the vendor page before you buy.
Instead (formerly Corvee)
The Corvee site states that "Corvee is now part of Instead." Instead lists document upload for intake, integrations with Google Drive, OneDrive and Box, e-file, and workpapers and memos as outputs. Sources: instead.com and Corvee integrations, accessed 2026-09-23.
Holistiplan
Holistiplan is built advisor-first. It takes returns by PDF upload with OCR, lists Redtail and Wealthbox CRM integrations, and offers an API that requires approval. Sources: Holistiplan integrations and Holistiplan API help, accessed 2026-09-23.
TaxPlanIQ
TaxPlanIQ supports bulk upload of up to 100 Form 1040 returns and produces a white-label ROI summary, slide deck and report. Its tiers are $397, $697 and $997 per month as published on 2026-09-23; check the vendor page. Source: TaxPlanIQ pricing, accessed 2026-09-23.
Intuit Tax Advisor
Intuit Tax Advisor imports directly from Lacerte and ProConnect, which Intuit describes as "no scanning," and produces a branded PDF plan. Source: Intuit Tax Advisor features, accessed 2026-09-23.
Bloomberg Tax Income Tax Planner
Run Bloomberg Tax Income Tax Planner through the same six rows using Bloomberg Tax's current product pages.
Thomson Reuters Planner CS
Run Thomson Reuters Planner CS through the same six rows using Thomson Reuters' current product pages.
Every number in a TracePrep Study traces back to the evidence behind it.
Where TracePrep fits
TracePrep ships one workflow today: the Reasonable Compensation Study. Each figure in a Study traces to its source, a Reviewer signs off on the conclusion, and the workpapers belong to the Firm.
TracePrep is building a tax-planning workflow on the same evidence discipline. It's in development, and this page doesn't describe features, screens or integrations for it. If you want to see the discipline it starts from, see how a Study is built.
Conclusion
Run every demo against the same six rows. Weigh the evidence trail as heavily as the projection, because the projection is what sells the plan and the trail is what your firm has to stand behind later. If you want the Study workflow in your firm now, Get started.
Not tax advice.
TracePrep is a software product from TracePrep Inc., not a CPA firm. This content is operator experience for educational purposes; it is not tax advice and has not been reviewed by a licensed CPA. Consult a qualified tax professional for guidance on your specific situation. Source citations in TracePrep workpapers support audit defense but do not guarantee IRS outcomes.
Frequently asked questions
Is tax planning software different from tax prep software?
What should a tax plan deliverable include?
How is tax planning software priced?
Does TracePrep offer tax planning software?
Bobby Huang · founder of TracePrep Inc.
Bobby Huang is the founder of TracePrep, the firm-owned reasonable-compensation study platform.
Ready to build a Study your firm owns?
Start a reasonable compensation Study with traceable evidence behind every number and workpapers your Reviewer signs off on.
Related reading
- Workpaper Evidence
TaxDome Integrations for Tax Planning Software: What Connects to What
TaxDome integrations, Karbon integrations and Holistiplan integrations mapped: which tax planning tools connect to tax prep, CRMs, storage and Zapier, as of 2026-09-23.
Bobby Huang8 min read - Workpaper Evidence
Tax Planning Software for Financial Advisors: A Plain Guide
How a financial advisor picks tax planning software: return intake, CRM and planning connectors, output and pricing model, with vendor facts dated 2026-09-23.
Bobby Huang8 min read - Workpaper Evidence
How to Read a Tax Return: A Guide for Financial Advisors
How to read a tax return as a financial advisor: which Form 1040 pages and schedules to open, the S-corp signals to flag, and a one-page handoff checklist.
Bobby Huang8 min read