Tax Preparation
Section 7216 and AI Tools: What Tax Preparers Should Check
Jump to a section
Key takeaways
- The IRS Section 7216 Information Center opens by describing final Treasury Regulations "on rules and consent requirements relating to the disclosure or use of tax return information by tax return preparers".
- The page's text doesn't mention AI tools.
- The page refers to consent requirements without listing them, and doesn't say whether sending return information to an AI tool's vendor is a disclosure or a use.
- A vendor's training line speaks to training; the Anthropic line quoted here doesn't mention section 7216.
- The Firm can choose to write questions per tool and per task and take them to its own counsel before client data goes in.
- The Firm can choose to file counsel's written answer with the question, the tool, the task, the date asked and who asked.
A Firm that wants an AI tool near client return files runs into one question early: is section 7216 involved? This post on section 7216 and AI tools doesn't answer it. It reads the IRS's own page on the subject, quotes it, marks what the page leaves open, and ends with a list of questions for the Firm's counsel.
Every quoted rule comes from that page, word for word. Nothing here says what the regulations require, permit or prohibit. The answers belong to the Firm's counsel or compliance lead, and what the Firm does with them is the Firm's choice.
What the IRS Section 7216 page says
The IRS keeps a page called the Section 7216 Information Center. As read on October 16, 2026, it opens by describing final Treasury Regulations "on rules and consent requirements relating to the disclosure or use of tax return information by tax return preparers" that "became effective Dec. 28, 2012."
Lower on the page, under a heading for one revision, "Revision to Section 301.7216-2 Guidance", the description of that guidance says: "These final and temporary regulations provide updated guidance regarding the disclosure and use of tax return information by tax return preparers without taxpayer consent."
It says the regulations and related revenue rulings "enable tax return preparers to more effectively provide a range of services that taxpayers would ordinarily expect from tax return preparers."
The page lists two revenue rulings. Each one "Provides guidance on whether a tax return preparer is liable for criminal and civil penalties under Internal Revenue Code sections 7216 and 6713" in named situations. Those situations include contacting taxpayers about changes in tax law, sharing a permitted list with a newsletter service provider, disclosures to a professional liability insurance carrier, and disclosure to an unrelated attorney evaluating a claim. The page's summary doesn't state what the rulings conclude, so this post doesn't either.
For more, the page points to the final regulations, two revenue procedures, the revenue rulings, and a "Section 7216 frequently asked questions" page.
What the page doesn't answer
The page's text doesn't mention AI tools. It doesn't use the words "software", "vendor" or "cloud" either.
It doesn't say whether sending return information to an AI tool's vendor is a disclosure, a use, both or neither. It refers to "consent requirements" but doesn't list what a consent must contain or address consent for AI tools. It names criminal and civil penalties under two code sections and doesn't state any penalty amount.
The Firm can ask its counsel to read the regulations, revenue procedures and rulings the page points to against a proposed tool and task.
That silence is only the summary page's. This post didn't read the regulations, revenue procedures, rulings or FAQ page it points to, so it can't say whether any of them addresses AI tools. A Firm can take the question to its own counsel before any client data goes into a tool.
A vendor's training default is a different question
Anthropic publishes a line about whether it trains models on what customers put into its commercial products. That line speaks to training. Here it is, with the date it was read.
Anthropic's model-training page, as read on October 17, 2026 (UTC), says: "This article is about our commercial products such as Claude for Work and the Anthropic API." On that scope it says: "We will not use your chats or coding sessions to train our models, unless you choose to participate in our Development Partner Program." The same page says that if you explicitly report materials or explicitly opt in to training, "then we may use those materials to train our models."
The line quoted here doesn't mention section 7216, so it doesn't answer the questions above. These are excerpts with a read date. The Firm can choose to reread the current page the day it sends counsel its questions.
For the account terms side by side, see the side-by-side reading.
Questions to take to counsel before client data goes in
The Firm can write these per tool and per task. The Firm can choose a separate question list for each task.
- Is sending return information to this vendor a disclosure, a use, both, or neither under the regulations?
- If the regulations call for consent here, what goes in the consent, and who gives it?
- Does the account type, or the vendor's training line, change the answer?
- Does a masked or partial copy of the file change the answer?
- Do the revenue rulings the page lists bear on this use?
- What should the Firm keep on file to show the question was asked and answered?
The Firm can ask counsel whether the quoted training line affects the answer for its proposed tool and task.
A Firm may also decide that one task's answer doesn't carry over to another task until counsel says so.
One way to keep the record, the Firm's choice: file counsel's written answer with the question, the tool, the task, the date asked and who asked.
A Doe example
Riley Doe owns Doe Tax Group and wants to try an AI tool for drafting a missing-items request. Before any client file is opened in the tool, Riley writes the six questions for that one tool and that one task. Riley attaches the link to the IRS Section 7216 Information Center and the vendor's training line with its as-of date, and sends the list to Jordan Doe, the Firm's outside counsel.
While the list is with Jordan, practice runs use a synthetic Doe practice folder only, with no client file in it.
When Jordan's written answer comes back, Riley files it with the question list, the tool, the task, the date asked and Riley's name as the person who asked.
The example doesn't say what Jordan answered; that answer is counsel's to give.
Where TracePrep fits
TracePrep is tax-prep software for CPA and EA firms. We've built a tax-prep plugin that drafts prep work in your Firm's workflow. The plugin drafts; the Firm's preparer prepares; the Reviewer signs off. Access to the plugin is by waitlist.
Want the TracePrep plugin in your Firm? We'll tell you when access opens.
Not tax advice.
This is general information, not tax or legal advice. Your licensed professional and your Firm's Reviewer are responsible for every return and every conclusion. Keep client data inside the systems your Firm has approved. As general guidance only, not advice: if you use an AI tool with client data, firms generally look for a business or commercial plan whose terms cover how that data is handled; read the vendor's current terms before you do.
Frequently asked questions
Does section 7216 apply to AI tools?
Does a vendor's no-training default settle the section 7216 question?
What does a section 7216 consent have to contain?
Do the penalty rulings on the IRS page cover AI tools?
Where can a Firm read more from the IRS?
Bobby Huang · founder of TracePrep Inc.
Bobby Huang is the founder of TracePrep Inc. TracePrep is a tax-prep platform for CPA, EA, and accounting firms, and it also produces the Reasonable Compensation Study.
Related reading
- Tax Preparation
An AI Use Policy for a Tax Practice: What to Put in It
A section-by-section outline of a Firm's AI use policy: tools and accounts, client data, roles, review and sign-off, records, and who owns it.
Bobby Huang7 min read - Tax Preparation
Your Data Security Plan When You Add an AI Tool
The edits a Firm makes to its own written data security plan when it adds an AI tool: systems list, client data, access, storage, incidents, staff, sign-off.
Bobby Huang8 min read - Tax Preparation
A Status Board for AI-Drafted Files: Where Each File Stands
How a manager keeps a status board for AI-drafted files: six fixed stages, one owner and one date per file, and a weekly read for files stuck in a stage.
Bobby Huang7 min read